Online teaching and learning

kid-1520705_640

Many of us are now teaching our classes through a virtual learning environment. Most had very little notice, maybe one or two days, and are now on the steepest learning curve ever. Here are a few tips, followed by some very useful sites and links:

online learning

Several online sites are very kindly offering teachers free access to psychology resources  for at least a month, and often through to the end of June 2020. 

Thank you to those teachers who have sent their students home with copies of Psychology Sorted. Our sales have held steady through March, and we’re sure, with the key studies summaries, QR codes and links to many online resources, all students will appreciate this.

Finally, for those who would like to use psychology as a lens for discussing the current pandemic: 

I am sure there will soon be more resources available on this topic.

Cognitive biases like those listed on the Raconteur site (see this link, and below) can be a useful way to describe not only our own reaction to all the troubling news of the Covid-19 virus, but also to analyse the ever-changing reactions of some of the more prominent politicians!  Here’s hoping your families and you keep safe, and stay online 🙂

Cognitive biases

 

‘Psychology Sorted’ Book 1 second edition (including all the new additions) out now on Amazon!

Laura and I have been working hard to get the second edition of ‘Psychology Sorted’ Book 1, Core Approaches out – and here it is! This second edition includes key study summaries for all of the new additions to the Core Approaches – yes, those pesky topics that could come up on Paper 1, Section A. So, if you have been wondering about which study to use for agonists, antagonists, excitatory/inhibitory synapses, neural pruning etc. (I mention the Biological topics as these are the ones that seem to have caused us all so much grief!) then do not fear, we have them here!

You can order the book here

And if you love it please leave a review to say that you do!

Clinical biases in diagnosis

interview-2207741_640.jpg

In the abnormal psychology option, what is the difference between cognitive biases and clinical biases?

Clinical biases are cognitive biases that take place when a psychiatrist or psychologist is trying to make a diagnosis and label the behaviour. They can arise from experience (‘these symptoms nearly always mean this mental health problem’) and result in a misdiagnosis when other explanations for the behaviour are too readily discarded. This is a confirmation bias – symptoms are interpreted to confirm the mental health professional’s original swift diagnosis. It was demonstrated in Rosenhan (1973)  when the admitting medical staff interpreted the very vague symptoms described as schizophrenia, and even more clearly when the normal behaviour exhibited by the pseudo-patients was interpreted by medical staff to confirm the validity of the original diagnosis.

They can also arise from an existing societal and/or personal bias, such as an ethnic or gender bias. Jenkins-Hall and Sacco (1991) found that a sample of USA psychotherapists showed an ethnic bias against black clients in that they evaluated depressed black clients more negatively than depressed white clients. While both groups were diagnosed with depression, the black clients (ethnic minority in this case) were seen as being less socially capable and were evaluated as more seriously depressed, using a standardised scale. A larger study by Bertakis et al (2001) demonstrated that women were much more likely than men to be diagnosed as depressed by their primary care physicians, even with a similar number of visits. This showed a gender bias in diagnosis.

So, there is a clear link between this material and the study of cognitive biases, especially confirmation bias.

References

Bertakis, K.D., Helms, J., Callahan, E.J., Rahman, A., Leigh, P. & Robbins, J.A. (2001).  Patient Gender Differences in the Diagnosis of Depression in Primary Care.  Journal of Women’s Health & Gender-Based Medicine, 10(7), pp. 689-698.

Jenkins-Hall , K. & Sacco , W.P. (1991).   Effect of Client Race and Depression on Evaluations by White Therapists.  Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 10(3), pp. 322-333.

Rosenhan, D. L. (1973). On being sane in insane places. Science179(4070), pp. 250-258.

Taking a holistic approach to the course

connections jigsawI have been trying over the past few years to do this, and am sometimes asked what I mean by ‘a holistic approach.’  The easy way is to demonstrate using an example. If you are teaching/studying the abnormal psychology option, for instance, you will probably be doing this after you have spent some time looking at the core approaches to explaining human behaviour (biological cognitive and sociocultural) and also looking at research methods and ethics.

So, now comes the time to apply your learning to the content of this option. Explore the differences between psychiatry (more medically and biologically based) and psychology (more cognitively and socially based). Take major depressive disorder, for example: how might a psychiatrist explain it?  How might they look for evidence to see if their explanation is correct and what sort of evidence would they see as valuable? How valid is their method of looking for evidence? How reliable is it? Does it allow them to develop a theory of etiology of MDD that has good explanatory power? How might they want to treat MDD once they are sure a person is suffering from it? Discuss the benefits and limitations of this treatment. Are there any ethical considerations regarding this treatment? 

Now, how might a cognitive psychologist explain MDD? How would s/he look for evidence and what would they accept as evidence? How valid is this method? How reliable is it? Does it allow them to develop a theory of etiology of MDD that has good explanatory power? How would a cognitive psychologist treat MDD.  Discuss the strengths and limitations of this treatment. Are there ethical considerations regarding this treatment?

What about sociocultural arguments that childhood trauma, domestic violence, poverty and stress can all singly or in combination be responsible for MDD? That removing the conditions that lead to MDD is the best treatment? 

Finally, consider the eclectic approach that is more common nowadays. What is the evidence that a combined approach to both the diagnosis, explanation of* and treatment for MDD may be more successful than a single approach? What is the evidence that doing nothing also works? What about a choice of approaches, or sequential treatment?

If we start the abnormal psychology option with these questions and work together to answer them, then the specific content becomes easier to understand in context of perspectives on abnormal psychology, and within the framework of approaches to research. This can be put into practice in the other options as well. Put it all together!

*e.g. Interaction between genetic vulnerability, environmental trigger and possible faulty cognition.

FREE – Hallowe’en Offer!

Paranormal final final

Whoo Hoo! For HALLOWE’EN our Book 1 Kindle e-book is FREE! Get your best-ever bargain from Oct 31st to Nov 1st (Pacific time, so be patient if you’re in another time zone.) Just click on https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B07M6GDF1D and buy for nothing! It was always free to read with Kindle Unlimited, and now it will be free for everyone, but ONLY for two days. Hope you love our ‘Paranormal Distribution.’ 👻

Where I do my writing

Front of house from gardenMindfulness is so much easier when you live on Porto Santo island, Madeira’s ‘golden sister.’ Please excuse me for taking a step sideways this week to advertise the fact that our beautiful holiday home is now up for sale. It is semi-detached (we live next door and have NO plans to leave…ever). But we have decided to stop renting out the house and sell it instead. It is fully-equipped and furnished, and would make a great holiday home, or you could be like us and escape to a permanent paradise.  Other pictures may be seen on the Rightmove site at  https://www.rightmove.co.uk/overseas-property/property-84740432.html 

I am travelling for a few days, and also marking IB Diploma Extended Essays, but will be back with more suggestions from Psychology Sorted books very soon.

Is it all our parents’ fault?

breakup-3869065_640

How attachment styles can affect later relationships.

This topic is part of the syllabus for developmental psychology, with a focus on inter-generational transmission of attachment styles, not through genetic inheritance, but through vertical social transmission, as our parents’ styles affect our own attachment styles as babies, which affect our later relationships and our parenting as adults. Psychology Sorted Book 2 will be out soon, and will cover all the options.

The idea of attachment was developed by Bowlby, but it was his student Mary Ainsworth who looked in detail at how infants developed different attachment styles. Ainsworth and Bell,_1970 conducted research into the correlation between parenting (n this case mothering) and children’s attachment styles, as measured through separation anxiety and fear of a stranger.  She identified three different styles:

Insecure-avoidant attachment (Type A) – seen in 10-15% of strange situation studies

Secure attachment (Type B) – seen in 70% of strange situation studies

Insecure-resistant/ambivalent attachment (Type C) – seen in 10-15% of strange situation studies

Type D (insecure- disorganized/disorientated) was added later by Main and Solomon in 1986, to extend the categories.

John Bowlby suggested that children create an internal working model (schema) that helps them pattern their behaviour  in later relationships, and it is through Ainsworth’s work that we can see one way in which this may develop. Hazan & Shaver developed a ‘love quiz’ that they distributed through a local newspaper, to test the hypothesis that childhood attachment patterns affected adult relationships, through the operation of an internal working model. There is a similar quiz here, if you would like to try it! They concluded that there was a strong positive correlation between (remembered) styles of one’s parents, one’s own attachment styles, and patterns of behaviour within adult relationships.

I can see lots of problems with this theory – especially as we grow older.  Can we really blame our behaviour on our parents once we are ourselves parents or even grandparents? There are response bias issues with ‘love quizzes’ as self-report studies. Memory – do we remember accurately how our parents’ treated us?  Attribution theory – aren’t the least happy of us more likely to blame our parents, and the happiest of us likely to claim our happiness is the result of our personality?  (See research by Gottman et al, which is highly relevant to the Human Relationships curriculum).

These are just some of the questions we should be asking in the classroom.